Fear and Suggestion in the Republican Roman Army: Insurrection as a Reaction

Authors

  • Rubén Escorihuela Martínez Universidad de Zaragoza

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53351/ruhm.v9i19.687

Keywords:

Republican Roman army, physical traumas, psychological traumas, discipline, insurrection

Abstract

Greatest ruler of its time, one of the characteristics that defined Roman civilization was its military brilliance. The Roman army was much more than an instrument of conquest and territorial expansion: it became a means to spread the Roman culture and values. Its efficiency and strategic superiority made Roman legions a highly effective machine from a military perspective, as well as a lifestyle and one of the main symbols of the Roman world. Thus, together with the impulse of new techniques and combat tactics, the idea of a Roman soldier’s unbreakable discipline, loyalty to his general, to Rome, soon spread. However, to what extent was it true? Was the Roman army really so disciplined or, rather on the contrary, a rebellious army? Traditionally, discipline has been one of the main virtues assigned to the Roman army, to the point that authors such as Valerius Maximus, Flavius Josephus or Vegetius have considered it the ultimate reason why Rome ended up becoming an empire of universal dimensions. This idea, far from being restricted to classical times, has been reproduced to this day, casting the image of a brave, reckless and loyal soldier; a soldier who would definitely give up his life with a Roman weapon in his hand. But what price did Roman soldiers have to pay? What was the impact of war? Taking these and other questions as a reference, via a critical reading of authors such as Polybius, Cicero, Titus Livius, Plutarchus, Tacitus, Suetonius, Appianus or Dion Cassius, the potential impact of fear and suggestion, as well as other physical and psychological traumas affecting Republican Roman soldiers, will be assessed as a possible source of conflicts and insurrectionary episodes. To this purpose, a series of unfavorable military situations will be used as a basis in order to, on the one hand, analyze the behavior of the Republican Roman army in an adverse military context and, on the other hand, value the role played by insurrections as a resource through which Roman soldiers may have defended both their interests and their lifes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Rubén Escorihuela Martínez, Universidad de Zaragoza

    Graduado en Historia por la Universidad de Zaragoza, Rubén Escorihuela Martínez es contratado predoctoral en el Área de Historia Antigua del Departamento de Ciencias de la Antigüedad de la Universidad de Zaragoza, así como miembro del Grupo de Investigación Hiberus y de la Red Libera Res Publica. Actualmente, se encuentra realizando su tesis doctoral bajo la dirección del Dr. Francisco Pina Polo. El tema central de la misma es el estudio de la disciplina y la insurrección en el ejército romano republicano. Su actividad investigadora le ha llevado a presentar varias comunicaciones en diferentes congresos y seminarios de carácter científico, así como a coorganizar y coeditar las IV Jornadas Doctorales en Ciencias de la Antigüedad de la Universidad de Zaragoza. Recientemente, ha realizado una estancia de investigación en Roma y ha colaborado activamente con el Dipartimento di Scienze dell’Antichità de la Università degli Studi “La Sapienza” di Roma.

References

Adrian GOLDSWORTHY: The Complete Roman Army, London, Thames & Hudson, 2003.

Aislinn A. MELCHIOR: “Caesar in Vietnam: Did Roman Soldiers Suffer from Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder”, Greece and Rome, 58:2 (2011), pp. 209-223.

Alexandra HOLBROOK: Loyalty and the sacramentum in the Roman Republican army, Tesis doctoral inédita, McMaster University, 2003.

Andrea LATTOCCO: “Vae victis! La diserzione nei giuristi romani e nel codice penale militare: un istituto immutato”, Rassegna della Giustizia Militare, 5 (2017), pp. 1-15.

Caleb CARR: The Lessons of Terror: A History of Warfare Against Civilians, Nueva York, Random House, 2003.

Carlos ESPEJO: “Penas corporales y torturas en Roma”, Revista de estudios de antigüedad clásica, 7 (1996), pp. 93-111.

Catherine WOLFF: Déserteurs et transfuges dans l’armée romaine à l’epoque républicaine, Nápoles, Jovene, 2009.

Charles ANDRIEUX: La répression des fautes militaires dans les armées romaines, Clermont-Ferrand, De Bussac, 1927.

Charles AUBERTIN: “Sobre el servicio médico en los ejércitos de la Antigüedad”, Dendra Médica. Revista de Humanidades, 2 (2009), pp. 163-186.

Charles GOLDBERG: “Decimation in the Roman Republic”, Classical Journal, 111:2 (2016), pp. 141-164.

Davide SALVO: “The decimatio in the Roman World”, en Stephen O’BRIEN y Daniel BOATRIGHT (eds.), Warfare and Society in the Ancient Eastern Mediterranean. Papers arising from a colloquium held at the University of Liverpool, 13th June 2008, Oxford, Archaeopress, 2013, pp. 19-24.

Eduardo KAVANAGH: “El estandarte como aglutinante ideológico en el ejército romano”, en Fidel GÓMEZ y Daniel MACÍAS (eds.), El combatiente a lo largo de la historia: imaginario, percepción, representación, Santander, PUbliCan, Ediciones de la Universidad de Cantabria, D.L., 2012, pp. 29-40.

Eduardo KAVANAGH: Estandartes militares en la Roma antigua: tipos, simbología y función, Madrid, CSIC, 2015.

Enrique GOZALBES e Inmaculada GARCÍA: “En torno a la medicina romana”, Hispania Antiqva 33-34 (2009-2010), pp. 323-336.

Eugenia C. KIESLING: “Corporal Punishment in the Greek Phalanx and the Roman Legion: Modern Images and Ancient Realities”, Historical Reflections/Réflexions Historiques 32:2 (2006), pp. 225-246.

Fernando QUESADA: Estandartes militares en el mundo antiguo, Madrid, Aquila legionis, 2007.

François HINARD: “Les révoltes militaires dans l’armée républicaine”, Bulletin de l’Associatioin Guillaume Budé, 2 (1990), pp. 149-154.

François HINARD: “Sacramentum”, Athenaeum, 81 (1993), pp. 252-263.

Frank E. ADCOCK: The Roman Art of War Under the Republic, Cambridge, Mass., Harvard University Press, 1940.

Frederick CONWAY: Stories of Great Men, from Romulus to Scipio Africanus Minor, London, Bell, 1900.

George R. WATSON: The Roman Soldier, New York, Cornell University Press, 1985.

George W. CURRIE: The Military Discipline of the Romans from the Founding of the City to the Close of the Republic, Bloomington, Graduate Council of Indiana University, 1928.

Gianpaolo URSO (ed.): Terror et pavor: Violenza, intimidazione, clandestinità nel mondo antico (Atti del convegno internazionale, Cividale del Friuli, 22-24 settembre 2005), Pisa, ETS, 2006.

Giusto TRAINA: Carrhes. 9 juin 53 avant J.-C. Anatomie d’une défaite, Paris, Les Belles lettres, 2011.

John K. EVANS: “Resistance at Home: The Evasion of Military Service in Italy during the Second Century B.C.”, en Toru YUGE y Masaoki DOI (eds.), Forms of Control and Subordination in Antiquity, Tokio, E. J. Brill, 1988, pp. 121-140.

John RICH: “Roman Attitudes to Defeat in Battle Under the Republic”, en Francisco MARCO, Francisco PINA y José REMESAL (eds.), Vae Victis! Perdedores en el mundo antiguo, Barcelona, Publicacions i Edicions de la Universitat de Barcelona, 2012, pp. 83-111.

Jon E. LENDON: “Virtus y disciplina. La mente del soldado en la República media”, Desperta Ferro Especiales. La legión romana I. La República media, 6 (2014-2015), pp. 56-61.

Jonathan P. ROTH: “Ideologies of discipline in the Roman military”, Journal of Roman Archeology, 25 (2012), pp. 750-758.

Joseph HALL: “A Roman PTSD? Psychological Trauma and the Soldiers of Rome”, Ancient Warfare, 10:1 (2016), pp. 48-52.

Justin R. JAMES: Virtus et Disciplina: An Interdisciplinary Study of the Roman Martial Values of Courage and Discipline, Tesis doctoral inédita, University of Missouri-Columbia, 2019.

Kate GILLIVER: “The Augustan Reform and the Structure of the Imperial Army”, en Paul ERDKAMP (ed.), A companion to the Roman army, Malden, Blackwell, 2007, pp. 183-200.

Kathryn H. MILNE: The Republican Soldier: Historiografical Representations and Human Realities, Tesis doctoral inédita, University of Pennsylvania, 2009.

Lee L. BRICE: “Second chance for valor: restoration of order after mutinies and indiscipline”, en Lee L. BRINCE y Danielle SLOOTJES (eds.), Aspects of Ancient Institutions and Geography. Studies in Honor of Richard J.A. Talbert, Leiden, Koninklijke Brill NV, 2004, pp. 103-121.

Lindsay POWELL: “The Mood of the Armies: Morale and Mutiny in the Roman Army of the First Century AD”, Exercitus, 2:4 (1988), pp. 61-64.

Luuk DE LIGT: “Roman Manpower and Recruitment During the Middle Republic”, en Paul ERDKAMP (ed.), A companion to the Roman army, Malden, Blackwell, 2007, pp.114-131.

Manuel MARÍN Y PEÑA: Instituciones militares romanas, Madrid, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, 1956.

Margarita VALLEJO: “Sobre la persecución y el castigo a los desertores en el ejército de Roma”, Polis, 5 (1993), pp. 241-251.

María P. RIVERO: Imperator populi romani: una aproximación al poder republicano, Zaragoza, Institución Fernando el Católico, 2006.

Downloads

Published

— Updated on 2020-12-14

How to Cite

Fear and Suggestion in the Republican Roman Army: Insurrection as a Reaction. (2020). Revista Universitaria De Historia Militar, 9(19), 77-97. https://doi.org/10.53351/ruhm.v9i19.687

Similar Articles

101-110 of 144

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.